The first one is, from what I remember, coming from a book written by Bernard Weber.
There is a farmer trying to push his donkey into a box and his son is observing them. The donkey doesn't really want to go into the box, infact it doesn't want to be forced into the box. The father pushes the donkey even harder, but the harder he pushes the harder the donkey resists from being pushed. The son starts laughing at the scene. After a while the father, frustrated and irritated by the obstinence of the "stupid" donkey and by the laughing of his son, shouts at him : "you do it if you think you can !"
The son approaches the donkey and pulls his tail. The effect is immediate, the donkey jumps forward into the box...
The second one was told to us (a group of students) from Mr Colum Gregory (Osteopath, teacher/Tutor at the ESO).
Mr Gregory was at that time a student practicing at the ESO teaching clinic under the supervision of a senior tutor clinic, Mr Gez Lamb.
Colum was in a room with a patient and was trying desesperately to "crack" her T9 (a thoracic vertebrae) but it was really restricted. Gez Lamb finally came in the room and told him to unwind T9 using one of the legs as a leverage... (dear reader, if you are not an osteopath please acknowledge that such a technique is as irrationnal as it is obscure for you to understand). Mr Gregory did so and after a few moment the patient started crying excessively. This is what we call a good somato-emotionnal release. Colum asked her what happened and she replied that she remembered a particular incident that had happened during her childhood when some boys attached her to a tree and were particularly nasty with her.
This T9 restriction couldn't be forced to shift with a HVT or a LVT technique, fascial unwinding was THE technique to use to release this restriction with this particular patient.
While we could have forced the donkey into the box by pushing it with a tractor or "cracked" this patient's vertebrae with the help of a professionnal wrestler, a different approach adapted to the patients particular needs seemed to have worked and done the trick.
We are constantly confronted in practice with multiple choices of techniques we can use on one patient and on one particular restriction.
On certain patients a structural adjustment will have fantastic results, while others will react by tensing up even more.
On certain patients deep tissue massage relaxes the contracted muscle whilst with others the muscle will contract even more.
On certain patients the cranial approach will have almost miraculous effects whilst others will take you for a quack.
Is it possible that for any patient's restriction there is one specific approach which will be the most effective with the less side-effects ?
Which one needs to be used ? GAT, GOT, HVT. LVT, Recoil, BLT, direct/indirect cranial approach, MET, PNF, A/P work, Unwinding, Strain/counter Strain, Trigger point inhibition, dry needles, Functionnal techniques...
Is there a reason why a patient may react better with a certain type of technique or approach ?
I believe there is one, and the reason could be explained due to the Psychology of the Tissue.
I will employ this term to express living structures such as bones, ligaments, muscles, capsules, tendons, arteries, nerves, cells, fasciae...
There are some debates about it. Some state that the memory resides exclusively in the brain and some others believe that the memory is also localised in the tissue itself at a cellular level. This memory is very important as it will influence the psychology and the comportement of the tissue. I would say that there are 3 major memory mechanisms, and certainly many more.
The somato-psychologic, the psycho-somatic and the somatic-somatic memory (please note that I use the term somatic in its broader sense including the visceral sphere).
When we hurt ourselves some afferent information coming from the injured area is sent to the brain. A part of this information analyses the type and quality of the pain felt while another part is sent to our limbic system where the brain will attach an emotion to this pain (in which circumstance this injury happened) and will compare it to previous similar injuries.
- Let's take two similar injuries which happened to two different individuals :Imagine a soldier on a battlefield who whilst carrying and saving the life of one of his team mates, twisted his ankle. Now imagine another random person who whilst on stage live on TV, missed a step and twisted his ankle, and by this action, embarrassed himself in front of million of spectators. During a treament the practitioner will certainly notice this injury. Asking about the cause of this trauma will awaken a sense of pride and self-confidence to the ex-soldier whilst it will awaken a deep sense of shame to the other patient. The internal chemical secretion and the immediate reaction of these two patients will be totally different.
- Imagine now a widower who just lost his wife. Every single one of his friends came to him and whilst putting their hand on his shoulder asked him : "How do you feel?" or "How are you?" This scene is repeated 100 times. It creates a deep anchor mixed with a pavlov reflex between the sensation of feeling the hand of a friend on his right shoulder, the sentence "how do you feel?" and the deep sadness. Six months later our widower starts recovering slowly. One of his friend innocently put his hand on his shoulder and asks him :"How are you?" Unconsciously, a voice will say : " I was feeling fine until you reminded me I lost my love 6 months ago by reactivating this anchor..." Internally the chemical reaction will lower his mood for the day.
The Psycho-somatic memory :
Of course there is ! when the patient is clearly stressed because of his job, his symptoms don't go away as soon as he leaves his office. After a whole life of perpetual stress, the patient can become really rigid and his muscles really fibrotic.
In fact this psycho-somatic memory can be more specific. if you had suffered from a relatively serious injury or trauma, months after the incident you will over protect the affected area. This over protection is accomplished by facilitating the contraction of protective muscles. The muscular tone is increased from a constant neurological firing. After years of over-stimulation the muscles become fibrotic.
After a whiplash, a repetitive trauma, an injury the structure of a tissue will be affected and that is a form of memory. If you suffered from a broken radius in your childhood, 40 years later an Xray will reveal an extra calcification; this is a structural memory of a trauma. If you suffer from a complete tear of a ligament, the memory is there, the ligament is gone.
As each traumatised or injured area is unique we can understand that they will behave and react differently to the same external stimulus. Two different injured/traumatised areas will react differently to the same type of technique (same stimulus). Each "osteopathic lesion" has its own psychology.
The notion of different body types is a concept. I will discuss the bodytypes described by Sheldon. Sheldon distinguished three main bodytypes coming fom the three types of embryological tissues known as endoblast, mesoblast and ectoblast. Each one of these groups is associated with specific physical and psychological attributes.
-the ectomorph : is roughly a predominance of the element of restraint, inhibition, and of desire of concealment. Cerebrotonic people shrink away from sociability as from too strong a light. They "repress" somatic and visceral expression, are hyperattentional, and sedulously avoid attracting attention to themselves. Their behaviour seems dominated by the inhibitory and attentional functions of the cerebrum, and their motivational hierarchy appears to define an antithesis to both the other extremes.
In fact the ectomorph is not a physically strong individual. To "survive" in the world he cannot rely on his physical body but on his intellect. The ectomorph type has a tendency to intellectual over-stimulation and introspection.
The endomorph relies more on his digestive system. Life is not only about hunting and thinking but is also about eating and enjoying it ! The endo is a "bon vivant" as we will say in french.
Osteopathic approach of the bodytypes
The following idea is easier to expose with the ectomorph and mesomorph type. Tom Dummer was using the functional/structural terms: Structural for mesoblastic constitution and functional for ectoblastic and endoblastic constitution.
In Osteopathy structural type of techniques are really effective on mesomorph patients while ectomorphs tend to react better to the functional techniques. Of course sometimes a functional approach is better to be used with a restriction of a mesoblastic patient and vice-versa.
It means that HVT/LVT ("cracking") techniques, GAT (general articulation techniques), deep soft tissue work, General Oteopathic treatment are the techniques of choice with the mesomorph patients.Whereas ectomorph patients have a good response with indirect functional techniques, Balance ligament tension techniques, gentle innhibition, fascial techniques, cranio-sacral treatment...
It also means that ectomorphs react a bit too much to structural techniques while the mesos are wondering what you are trying to achieve by touching their head lightly!
We said in the previous chapter that different bodytypes had different psychological profiles; let's make a comparison between the techniques used and the psychological profiles of these two groups.
gross psychological profile: vigorous, aggressive, competitive, dominating
type of technique: GAT, HVT, LVT, deep STW.
gross psychological profile: (hyper)sensitive, intellectual, introspection, inhibited
type of technique: gentle inhibition, functional techniques, BLT, cranial, fascial unwinding...
I don't know if we read the same thing but it appears to me that there is a disturbing correlation between the psychological profile and the technique used. I would even say that the technique used for each profile is the best psychological way to communicate manually with the tissue of the patient. Structural approach imposes a certain state to the tissue whilst the functional one listens and discusses with the body of the patient.
Now let's take a typical mesomorph patient : a rugby player or a marine soldier. How would you convince them about something ? How will you convince them to win a game or to fullfill their mission ? Will you use a diplomatic or an authoritative speech ? that's right an authoritative one : you will give orders, you will shout at them and you will have to be more dominating than they are. The structural techniques are authoritative, strong, "aggressive", dominating...
What about a typical ectomorph patient : a chess player or a computer "geek". How would you convince them ? How will you convince them that they should change their tactiques or their programs ? Will you use an authoritative or a diplomatic speech ? Of course a diplomatic speech will be the best approach in order to convince them step by step of the need to change their point of view ! The functional techniques listens to the tissues, follows their logic and gently influences them.
We saw in a previous chapter that tissues had a "memory" and a "psychology". Wouldn't it be logical that our osteopathic techniques were psychological manual techniques ? In this case each technique will be a specific psychological manual tool to communicate with the traumatised tissue of the patient. It would mean that one technique would be more suitable than another according to the psychological profile of the injured tissue...
In the next chapter we will try to give a psychological definition to the most common osteopathic techniques.
Psychological explanation of osteopathic techniques (Chapter in construction)
This part is HIGHLY subjective and I invite anyone to comment on it
In Osteopathy we treat the hypomobilities, the restrictions. We said that a traumatised tissue (a somatic dysfunction) had a certain psychology. In fact a traumatised tissue is "stuck" in a certain behaviour pattern (a way of thinking) because of a previous stimulus (trauma).
For a easier understanding we will say that the tissue thinks "A" when it is traumatised (traumatised=osteopathic lesions). The aim of a successful treatment is to bring this traumatised tissue which thinks "A" to a balance relaxed and open state of mind where it will think "B".
Let's try to understand and analyse the most common type of techniques :
The Structural techniques:
HVT: these are the "cracking techniques". Manual description of the technique :With this type of techniques we impose a quick and "violent" stretch against the restriction of the somatic dysfunction in order to gap the joint. A "crack" sound is usually synonyme of a successful maneuver. Within a few minutes the joint has gain a significant gain in its range of movement. Psychological description of the technique : we give an order to the joint by imposing a point of view exactly opposite to his. You think "A" and I order you to think "B"and I impose you "B", no discussion.
GAT (general articulation technique): Manual description : there is a notion of repetition with this techniqne. The aim is to mobilise a restriction by going against it. generally the grip is relatively firm in order to focus a "six degree of liberty"type of movement on the specific area and you . The technique is progressive, a slight pain/discomfort can be felt. It allows to smoothen up the restriction thus improving the mobility of the joint, especially fibrotic joints. Psychological description : there is a notion of repetition and progression in this technique while being in safe hands (the firm grip). It looks to me as if there was a coach encouraging, stimulating, brain-washing and overcoming a negative thought "A" to bring it to a point of achievement "B".
The Recoil (from the Mechanical Link, Paul Chauffour) : this is quite interesting one . Manual description : after 300 to 400 tests the practitioner finds THE primary lesion of the body and exert a recoil (a kind of precise flick) against the barrier of the restriction, and and you quickly remove your fingers from any contact with the body. Psychological description : the effect of a recoil could be like, questioning in a few words the patient about a deep rooted psychological conflict that he is victim of, bringing this thought from the unconscious to the conscious. eg: "did you accept the death of your father ? " the fact that your hands are not in contact anymore means that you don't want to listen to the reply, letting the patient to deal on his own with this issue. if the tissue thinks "A" the recoil could tell it : What about "B" ?
The functional techniques :
Indirect cranial/fascial and Balance ligament techniques : Manual description : the aim and philosophy of these techniques is to move toward the lesion in order to arrive at the still point. The still point is a point of relative calm (the eye of the tornado) where tensions are balanced. It induces a lack of proprioception coming from this area, the body react by changing the muscle tone or tensions in order to regain some afferent informations. The aim is to move from still point to still point until a balanced fluidic movement is felt. Psychological description: In these type of techniques the aim is certainly not to go against the will of the thought but to encourage it. The tissue thinks "A" ok, show me the idea, the concept, why are you like this ? why do you think "A"? why ? why again ? I don' judge you, i am not against you, I want you to show me why you think "A", what does it involve. Sometimes we don't really believe in it but we follow an idea (A) just to be in confrontations with others. The fact that others try to confrontate us on this idea make us react even more. this is the exemple of the donkey at the beginning of the post, the Donkey doesn't mind to get into the box, it doesn't want to be forced into ! or we could give another example : you need to leave and ask your child to come but he refuses to let go of his toy. Either you force him to let go of his toy and to come (big tantrum) otherwise you can say ok you want to stay here ? stay here but me, I am leaving. By leaving the child to what he thinks he wants, you avoid the confrontation, the child realises that he was looking for a confrontation not really being alone. As he sees you leaving, he quickly realises that he needs to follow you.
Another way to see it : if some one has a short sighted point of view on a particular subject, "A". Instead of contradicting it, you ask the reason why. Try to get to the bottom of his "A" point of view. There is a moment where the root of the idea "A" has no logical value. As soon as you will get to this unlogical root of the problem, the patient will logically analyse that it is unlogical. This realisation will start unwinding the whole misconception about this "A" idea leading the tissue toward a more balance "B" way of thinking.
Functional technique: Manual description : Our starting position is "in" the restriction and the aim of a well executed technique is to arrive to the opposite position of the joint without avoiding any conflict with the restriction of the lesion : "follow the ease, avoid the bind". Psychological description : the tissue thinks "A" and by using a step by step agreement we bring the point of view of the tissue to "B".
MET (isometric): manual description : we find the motion barrier of a muscle or a joint and ask the patient to push against our resistance with 30 % of his force. After maintaining the isometric resistance for 5-7 secondes, we ask the patient to relax. After 2-3 seconds we stretch the muscle/joint until the next motion barrier. This process is generally effectuated 3-4 times. Psychological description : This technique feels like you ask the traumatised tissue to express its "A" thought while you remain still. After the "A" thought is expressed then you conter-attack with a gentle opposite "B" view (stretch). The fact that your resistance remains still may express that you don't accept the "A" argumentation given by the tissue.
The concentric MET could express encouragement to the tissue we want to strengthen. The Eccentric MET could challenge the tissue we want to work on.
Fascial unwinding : Manual description : the practitioner contacts the tissue to unwind. It can be a fascia, a muscle, a joint, a limb or even the whole body ! The aim is give a positive feedback to the proprioception to the tissue to unwind allowing it to express itself. The patient may have the sensation that the practitioner is moving his arm (for eg) while in fact the practitioner just follow the movement that the arm of the patient wants to express. The fascial unwinding may look like a "Neurologic Symphony" as the movement described are very smooth and intriguing. You can adapt this technique to the whole body and relive a certain traumatic event such as a fall in the stairs, a repetitive fascial trauma (repetitive hammering for eg) or even re-live your birth! Psychological description : it is a sort of encouragement to the expression of a trauma by "mirroring" the information received.
The explanations that I give are purely coming from my own interpretation. If you disagree or have another "psychological explanation", I'll be happy if you could comment on this post.
As two different osteopathic lesions have a different cause and a different memory, the chance that they react the same to the same technique is inexistent. This can explain why a mesomorph may react better with a functionnal technique on certain of his somatic dysfunctions and visa versa with an ectomorph.
It is possible that there is more than a single psychological blockage with a traumatized tissue. This could be the reason why sometimes you need to use different techniques to relax a tension, eg : deep STW, functional inhibition and HVT.
It could explain why such studies to check if spinal manipulations are effective in acute lowback pain are failing. Maybe that some of the acute facet lock shouldn't be manipulated because it is not the "psychological" way to convince them to relax ! (Of course other reasons may certainly interact with the study : please report to the post "lower back pain, an osteopathic perspective")
It could also explain the example that I give at the beginning of the post. This patient reacted so much with a fascial unwinding technique because it was the technique needed to express this tension.
It is, I think, very hard to know which exact technique to use on which patient, and this comes from a practitioners experience, skill and an open mind; this is the art of Osteopathy. If the somatic dysfunction doesn't release with a technique , I urge you not to persist but maybe to communicate with it in a different way.
From my belief a very good Osteopath should succeed to detect and understand the causes of the patient's complaint and at the same time he should know which technique needs to be used to get the best release from this particular restriction.